Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Government’ Category

I have just finished reading an article regarding the pay back of TARP funds by 7 banks and  banking institutions.  The total sum to be repaid is $68 billion dollars.  Guess that this will put to rest the grumblings by the far right that the government is trying to take over the banking industry, when in actuality, the government was merely lending monies to these institutions until they could get their financial underpinnings shored up.  Among those who are going to be repaying monies are JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, and Morgan Stanley.  Regulators’ stress tests of bank balance sheets gave Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan a clean bill of health. Morgan Stanley was required to raise $1.8 billion in fresh capital, a task it completed not long after the tests’ results were announced.

Together these three banks received $45 billion in TARP funds.  Reuters reported on Morgan Stanley’s plans yesterday, the CEO of Goldman Sachs, Lloyd Blankfein, announced the plans for the payback in a letter to lawmakeers, and CNBC reported JPMorgan’s plans this morning.  I already knew this information as the president had informed the American people of these pay backs last week,in a news conference covered by CNN. 

In other news regarding the economy, Chrylser just announced their plans to RE-OPEN 7 of it’s plants.  From Fox News (local), The company confirmed that factories in Sterling Heights and Warren, Mich.; St. Louis; Toledo, Ohio; Brampton and Windsor, Ontario; and Toluca, Mexico, would restart operations.

 

It would appear that the plan to strengthen our economy and banking industry may be working, contrary to what the far right naysayers may be trying to tell us.

 

Sources:

http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/06/17/jpmorgan-goldman-sachs-join-morgan-stanley-in-tarp-exit/

FOX2now.com

Read Full Post »

I just heard another news story about racism in America.  It seems that the amount of racism that has been coming to light in  the Republican party just continues to grow.  I truly thought that this country had come further than this and am so disheartened when I see such garbage, that I begin to despair of racism ever being eradicated from our world.  Then, I realized that the only way to help end this racist hatred, is to make sure that as many people see it as possible, and that those who engage in this horrid, hateful, nasty, unproductive, unnecessary, un-American crap, know that the rest of this country does not approve, and that we do not accept their hatred and so will ostracize them.  In that vein, I am posting a copy of an article by Terry McMoore, about a picture that was sent via email to the wrong list of people.

This incident happened in Tennessee, and the picture was sent by one Sherri Goforth, a legislative aide to State Senator Diane Black (R), who has been employed by the state for 20 years.  The real kicker is that the apology that Goforth issued, didn’t apologize for the picture or it’s racism, but rather that she was sorry because she hit the wrong button and sent it to the wrong list of people.  Makes me wonder how many more offensive emails she has sent out, and whether she is doing it while working and earning wages paid by tax dollars.  What a disgrace. 

The silence from those who were so rabid about David Letterman’s comments concerning Sarah Palin’s daughter, Bristol, is deafening, and the tent that Republicans say is large enough to hold people of all races, continues to shrink.  Soon it will be just large enough for the “good ol’ boys”.  Disgraceful.

The complete article follows, including the picture that she emailed to the “wrong list of people”.

 

 

Aide to State Senator sends racist e-mail

 

 

By Terry McMoore | June 16, 2009 | Print This Post
 

Tennessee Democratic legislators and Black Caucus members are outraged over an e-mail about President Barack Obama that was sent by a state employee who works for Republican State Senator Diane Black.

The e-mail from Sherri Goforth, a legislative aide and twenty year employee for the state was sent to other staff who also work for Republican Senators. Goforth claims to have hit the wrong button and sent the email to the wrong list of people according to published reports.

The controversial email showed either a portrait or photo of all 43 U.S. presidents but when you get to the picture of Barack Obama the 44th president there is only a wide set of white eyes in a black box background.

 

Controversial Picture Sent By Aide Of GOP Lawmaker Controversial Picture Sent By Aide Of GOP Lawmaker 

 

 

Senator Diane Black was quoted as saying “I was shocked and I was disappointed.” “It absolutely does not reflect my beliefs or my opinion and I will not tolerate this kind of communication from my office.”

For her actions Sherri Goforth only received a verbal warning and written reprimand placed in her records. Some Tennessee Legislative Democrats as well as Tennessee Democratic Party Chairman Chip Forrester are calling for Goforth to be fired. In a press release the TNDP chairman goes on to say “This e-mail is reprehensible, insults the office of the president and is embarrassing to all Tennesseans regardless of political party,”

Tennessee Black Caucus of State Legislators Chairman, John Deberry Jr. was quoted as saying “It sort of undermines what we’re trying to do and gives strength to many of the stereotypes that are perceived about us here in the south,”

Many others believe the e-mail has had done serious damage to Tennessee’s image, reputation and will become a blight on the state.

 

Source:

 

http://www.clarksvilleonline.com/2009/06/16/aide-to-state-senator-sends-racist-e-mail/

Read Full Post »

I have spent the last week hearing, and seeing, interviews with Sarah Palin, droning on about how incensed she is regarding the remarks made by David Letterman in reference to one of her daughters.  She insists the joke was about 14 year old Willow, and Letterman says it was about 18 year old Bristol.  That point is moot, as the remark was in poor taste either way, and he should have been roundly slapped down for it.  And he has been. He has been called a pedophile, a dirty old man, and child rapist by some because of that remark, which is going  just a bit overboard in my opinion.   That being said, he does not represent  the feelings of the Democratic party.  HE IS  A COMEDIAN, WHO WRITES JOKES FOR A LIVING, NOT A POLITICIAN.  I do wish he would have kept his mouth shut, if for no other reason than it gave Sarah Palin, the most inane speaker I have ever had to displeasure of listening to, a reason to start flapping her lips again.  She is so far out of her league, that if this were baseball, she would be playing tee ball and the rest of the players would be Albert Pujols.  

I keep reading the self-pronounced claims by the Republican party about being the party of  family values and equality.  They insist that their tent is large enough to include all segments of the population, and that they welcome all minorities with open arms.  If that is true, then they need to inform their activists. 

Over the weekend a gorilla escaped from a zoo in Columbia, South Carolina.  Now I have seen these animals, and they are truly magnificent.  They are powerful, beautiful, smart, and when you look at them, you cannot help but have a feeling of  intense awe.  However, a longtime  Republican party activist in South Carolina decided that he saw another side of these phenomenal animals and informed the world that this gorilla was also an ancestor of Michelle Obama, on his facebook page.  This comes during a campaign, by the Republican party in South Carolina, to show minorities that the party is opening it’s collective arms to them, and that their tent is large enough for everyone.  

The activist, Rusty DePass, issued a half-hearted apology, but also blamed Michelle Obama for his remarks. 

 

 

Excerpt from an article on POLITICS DAILY, by DAVID KNOWLES, 6/15/09

“I’m sure it’s just one of Michelle’s ancestors – probably harmless.”

Apparently, not only is DePass fond of racist humor, he also doesn’t think too highly of evolution, either. One can tell a lot about a person from the apology he or she issues following an off-color joke, and on this score DePass seemed intent digging his hole a bit deeper.
…DePass told WIS-TV in Columbia, “I am as sorry as I can be if I offended anyone. The comment was clearly in jest.”
Then he added, “The comment was hers, not mine,” claiming that Michelle Obama made a recent remark about humans descending from apes. The Daily News could find no such comment.
 
 One wonders if DePass feels the same way about RNC chairman Michael Steele.
 The “I’m sorry if I offended anyone” line (but not sorry if I didn’t) is something of a classic refrain for those who think they’ve done nothing wrong. DePass may think it’s funny to liken black people to apes while exempting his own genetic heritage, but it is comments like these that will ensure that the South Carolina does not evolve beyond its current its current Neanderthal status.

 

 

Remarks like these are the reason that the Republican party is in the fix it is in.  In order to be thought of as the party of family values and equality for all races, they are going to have to purge the party of these old white men, who continue to spew this poison.  The party yells loudly about a comedian and his jokes about a young, white girl, but turns a blind eye to the hatred and racism within it’s own party, and then has the audacity to question the patriotism of any who dare disagree with them.Of course, this is only my opinion and I could be wrong, but I think that comparing our First Lady, Michelle Obama, to a gorilla is a pretty clear example of racism at it’s finest. 

 

Guess that tent isn’t quite a big as they would like us to believe.

Read Full Post »

I found this article quite by accident this evening and was so shocked (why, I don’t know, after all the things I have read and heard in the last year, but especially in the last 7 months) that I decided to reprint it on my blog.  The remarks made by these people go beyond comedy.  They are absolutely disgusting.  Joking about skin color is bad enough, but then to joke about assassinating  our president on top of that, is unbelievable, and truly crosses the line.  This actually was part of a radio show done before the President was sworn in, so they can’t even say that they are disgruntled with his policies.  He hadn’t made any yet.  See what you think.

Radio Canada:

 

Easier to Shoot a Black

 

President in

 

the White House

 

Posted May 29th 2009 11:25AM by Denver Louis
Filed under: BlackSpin, News, Opinion, Obama

In a rehash of a tasteless and ignorant sentiment shared by few Americans, a Canadian comedy program, shown on the French-language Radio-Canada network, recently came under fire for joking about the possible assassination of President Barack Obama. Oddly enough, the show (“Bye-Bye 2008“) took place on New Year’s Eve, nearly six months ago. But due to hundreds of complaints, something is finally being done about it.

The radio segment featured a slew of offensive statements in which the hosts seemed to revel in their own banter. At one point, one of the hosts stated, “We’re not racists. It will be good to have a Negro in the White House. It will be practical. Black on white, it will be easier to shoot him.”

To its credit, the Canadian Broadcasting Standards Council said it found, “nothing redeeming in the allegedly comedic notion that an American president should be shot, still less that this would be easier to achieve because of the color of the president’s skin. It was a disturbing, wounding, abusive racial comment.”

On another segment of the show, an Obama impersonator was featured in a faux interview in which the host said, “The blacks, you all look alike,” and then warned viewers to hide their purses.

Talk About It: Is It Ever Funny To Joke About Killing the President?

The council added that the comments and sketches breached regulations, saying they “went too far in terms of Canadian broadcast standards.” Which is kind of a given, provided that they probably went too far as far as global broadcasting standards are concerned, save for, of course, those ever-resilient neo-Nazis and maybe the Klan on close-frequency ham radios.

Not surprisingly, the producers of the show actually denied the skits had been racist, saying they had meant to mock the characters making the offensive remarks, which is akin to saying Rush Limbaugh isn’t a racist… total BS.

The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) is supposedly conducting a probe of the show. And although it doesn’t have the power to fine Radio-Canada, it can issue a public reprimand.

According to a spokeswoman for the commission, such reprimands could cause problems for the network when it comes time to renew its broadcasting license. Radio-Canada is due to apply for a license renewal in 2011.

And amid all this is the fact that Canadians, like much of the world, overwhelmingly love President Obama. Polls regularly show that Canadians like Obama far more than they do their own leaders. Tens of thousands turned up to cheer him when he made a brief visit to Ottawa in February. That makes it even more mind-boggling that a radio station would think it was appropriate to air something so belligerent.

Read Full Post »

There is a piece of land in Somerset County, Pennsylvania that has become the center of a dispute between the US government and the land’s owners.  The land includes, and surrounds, the site where United Airlines Flight 93 crashed on September 11, 2001.  This is where the Boeing 757, which had been hijacked by terrorists, came down after a valiant, and successful, effort on the part of the passengers and crew, to prevent it’s use as a weapon to inflict death and destruction, most likely in Washington, D.C.  It is believed that the plane was headed for the White House, in an attempt to do what the other planes, on that fateful day, did to the Pentagon and the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center.  In other words, the hijackers intended to use this plane as a weapon.  The passengers on this flight knew what the hijackers had in store for them and the country, and in a display of true heroism, decided to do everything in their power to stop them.  They succeeded, but the cost was phenomenal.  40 crew and passengers died that beautiful fall day in 2001.  We will never know how many lives were saved by their bravery.  They truly gave their lives to defend our way of life.

Therein lies the problem that I have with the government’s plans for this memorial.  According to the National Parks Service, this memorial will cover 2,200 acres.  This does not merely encompass the crash site, but also a big chunk of the surrounding farm and wood land.  Land that has been in some of these families for several generations.  Now, if the owners are willing to sell this land to the government, and the government is willing to pay them what the land is truly worth, then there is no problem.  Personally, I don’t understand why the memorial has to be 2,200 acres,  but that is neither here nor there.  The real problem is that there are some people who have not come to a decision about whether they want to sell their land to the government for them to build a memorial on.  Some of this land is within several feet of the crash site, which is admittedly causing a problem, but there is also some land that is on the perimeter of where the National Park will be, further from the crash site.  One family will lose 62 acres of their 100 acre homestead.   So instead of changing the plans, making the memorial smaller, or checking for any other options, the government has decided to use Eminent Domain.  Eminent Domain is a phrase that should strike fear into the heart of any land owner.  It means that the government can offer you what they deem to be fair market value for your private property, and if you don’t want to sell, or think your land is worth more, and so won’t settle for their offer, they can simply take what is yours, and pay you what they want (their ideaof fair market value).  They do this by stating that your private land is going to be put to public use.   Public use can encompass the building of a strip mall, a parking lot, a highway, or anything else the local or federal government deems necessary.  It doesn’t need to be a true necessity, the government just needs to feel it is.  Personally, I believe that there are times that Eminent Domain may well be needed, and in those instances, the government should pay the owner for the property and even a little extra for the inconvenience involved.    However, I do not think that the government should be able to pull out the Eminent Domain card every time someone doesn’t want to sell their land to them.  Just because the government has  decided that the city, county, state, or country cannot possibly live without their latest boondoggle (and I am not calling the memorial in Somerset County, PA, a boondoggle, merely the other 95% of Eminent Domain cases), doesn’t mean, when the owners of the piece of property that government officials have their eye on, won’t sell it to them,  that they have the right to say “Too bad, this is for the good of the public, so we are going to buy it, whether you want to sell or not.  Now get out.”  In my opinion, that is wrong and it is against the general principals that this country was founded on.  The government should never be able to just take property they want, for a project that may or may not be essential to the good of the public, if  the owner of the property doesn’t want to sell.  It is just not right. 

The memorial in Somerset County, PA will be built.  The parks service is saying that in order for this memorial to be ready for a ribbon cutting on September 11, 2011, the construction needs to begin by November.  I wonder what the people who gave their lives on that fateful day would say if they knew the government was going to take the land of  private citizens in order to build a 2,200 acre national park to honor them?  Would they say, as I do, that the solution is to just make it smaller, and use the land they already have?  Or would they say, take the land, because the public simply cannot continue to advance without this memorial.  After all that is why Eminent Domain laws were originally written.  So that when the government deemed that the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few or the one, they could act in  the best interest of the city, county, state, or country.

To the families who lost loved ones on 9/11 and especially to the families of the passengers of UA Flight 93, I will never forget what happened on that day, and the sacrifice that the passengers on that flight made, and am sure no one else will either.  It is now as much a part of this country’s heritage as the Constitution, the fight for independence, the Civil War, Pearl Harbor, and so many other things that have happened that shape who we are today.  God Bless and keep you and yours.

 

For more info:

http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/05/29/flight.dispute/index.html?iref=hpmostpop

Read Full Post »